Overview of Race Conflict Theories

Overview of Race Conflict TheoriesPlacid TankieRace is a term that john be restored using some different ways within the society. In the United States of America, for example, research indicates that white people looks minatory people as having a darker skin color than black people normally go (Hills, 2002). In addition, the meaning and importance of speed up does not only varies from place to place, but also changes over time. For example, today, the Census delegacy allows people to describe themselves using different racial course of study which include six single charge options and fifty-seven multiracial categories (U.S. Census Bureau 2012). multitude can classify each another racially based on their physical characteristics such as skin color, facial structures, body structures, and hair texture. George Riter (2003), define race as a socially constructed category of people who share a common biologically traits that member of a society consider important. jibe to Lovem an (1999), in her article titled IsRace inborn? outline Eduardo Bonilla-Silva ideology and explanation nigh the limitations on the study of racial phenomena. Eduardo Bonilla-Silva showed that racial phenomena can be better still if it is considered as a structural system of racism. According Loveman (1999), Eduardo Bonilla-Silva identified several limitations of the existing approaches toward racial phenomena including the narrow way racism was considered by sociologists as foreign to transcriptionatic and rational, contemporary structure, both overt and covert behavior. The article also stipulates that Eduardo Bonilla-Silva believes that the structural speculation of racism based on the concept of radicalized social system can be used to overcome the limitations of racial phenomena in order to improve the understanding of the causes, mechanism, and consequences of racial phenomena. According to Loveman (1999), Eduardo Bonilla-Silva concept of improving the understanding of ra cial phenomena was based on confounding categories, reifying race, and analytical note between race and ethnicity.In addition, Loveman (1999) demonstrated in her work that the theoretical frame work proposed by Eduardo Bonilla-Silva in order to improve the understanding of the meaning of race and the consequences of racism related to the structural theory of racism was undermined by the different concepts Eduardo Bonilla-Silva used. These include confounding categories, reifying race, and analytical distinction between race and ethnicity. Loveman (1999) and other sociologists agree with Eduardo Bonilla-Silva about the importance of improving our understanding on racial phenomena, but argued that his structural theory of racism was not the best analytical frame work for understanding the meaning of race and its consequences on the society. Furthermore, these sociologists demonstrated that in order to understand how race shape social relation in the society, race should not be consi dered as a category of analysis, but race should focus on the processes of marches construction, maintenance, and decline which is a comparative sociology of group making that was built on Weberian concept of social closure (Loveman, 1999).More ever, the view of Eduardo Bonilla-Silva on racial phenomena was back up by other researchers such as Omi and Winant. These two sociologists defended the ontological condition of race based on the circular definitions and essentialist reasoning. In addition, their argument for a distinction between race and ethnicity was based on a particular reading of U.S. history rather than on any analytical foundation. Furthermore, Omi, Winant, and Eduardo Bonilla-Silva never define racial category without referencing to race. Mean while Loveman (1999) and other sociologists like Wacquant argued that this analytical pitfall of referencing to race in the definition of racial category can be avoided successfully by considering race as a category of analys is in order to gain analytical study of race as a category of practice.Adopting this analytical frame work which focus on the processes of group making and categorization of essentializing schemas. Generally, one can explore to what extent a particular essentializing wording is related to a particular form of social closure and its consequences. Therefore, it becomes a question to what extent, systems of classification, stratification, and social injustices can be supported by ideas that race can be distinct from those informed by a discourse of ethnicity or nationality (Loveman, 1999).Again, conflict of race occurs when the majority group of the society feels that the different cultures, morals, and values of the minority group causes deviance to the society. The conflict perspective is a frame work for building theory that looks society as an arena of inequality that generates conflict and changes. The race-conflict theory sees the society as an inequality and conflict between p eople of different racial and ethnic categories. The race-conflict theory is in accordance with the content of race because it highlights how race factors are linked to inequality in terms of several factors such as education, power, money, and social prestige. For example, the United States of America, which has people from different countries worldwide, is considered as the land of fortune and freedom, and it is also a country that is considered notorious for racial discrimination. From the beginning of this country, just like men confine power over women, white people have numerous advantages over people of color, including higher income, more schooling, better health and longer life expectancy. Racism has been one of the most important issues that the society have been facing and fighting for the past decades. Currently, racism has declined, but it is still an important issue that needs to be addresses always. Although removing racism from the world will caused a big bucks of sacrifices and suffering, I hope that people will be able to overcome racism, and live in a world where they do not care about an individual skin color or nationality.ReferencesHill, Mark E. Race of the Interviewer and Perception of the Skin Color Evidence from the Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality. American Sociology Review. Vol. 67, No.1 (Februrary 2002) 99-108.Loveman, Mara. Is Race Essential? America Sociological Review Vol. 64, No.6 (December 1990) 890-98.U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Employment Statistics. National Occupation Employment and Wage Estimate. 2012. Available at http//www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm